Beautiful thread comment from one of our patients:
3 Rounds (2019) I already had with
Avanti Derma -
PMMA
Now I had my Session 4 - yesterday. This ll be my Journey-Documentary.
C A S E: Empty Area
In all 3 sessions a pretty large area remained
PMMA-empty (or significant less
PMMA / squishy)
Potential reason: I had a history of
FFT (2018). So maybe this could be the reason the filler could not settle there properly.
Arguments against this Hypothesis: a) There are tons of good reviews of people who got
FFT and after that a good
PMMA result. b) The even bigger argument: There are also Clinics who do
FFT &
PMMA togheter for example with
Bellafill - intention: To reduce the total costs.
PhalloBoards.info/forum/general-discussi...
PMMA.html#1308715311
BUT - To be fair:
Casavantes tells us already - People with history of
FFT are not the ideal candidate. Otherwise on the website it‘s written a bit different.
„(…)Autologous fat transfer typically results in irregularities but develops a light degree of fibrosis that facilitates soft tissue fillers’ implants. These patients are good candidates for
Phalloplasty.“
Why I come back ‚so late‘ with my issue ?
In the years meantime I was not „unbusy“. I was loose-cut before and I wanted to become the ideal candidate. Patience & Effort: 3 Operation I had — To get the shaft-skin tight like I have it now.
Penile Webbing surgery (has also subtle effect on your shaft skin) + distal (low) tight-cut. This effort was in the years: •2020 / •2021 / •2023 (!)
@Tight cut Advantages:
A. You make it your doctor so much easier to install the implant with a tight cut. Also it‘s the recommendation of Dr.
Casavantes.
B. Settle-Time of the Filler (the first days) Especially in my case (empty area) I want to reduce migration significantly with that tight cut. So the product stays where it has been injected.
C. Usage: Filler gets nice compressed while
Erection.
Why
Avanti Derma again?
S E R V I C E
In all this years there popped up a lot of alternatives & new
PMMA Options.
Why I decided to go to
Avanti Derma again: The Service.
To give an example: ..(As I said -in all my 3 sessions this area remained empty/squishy).. Service: When In Session 3 -as part of the aftercare appointments- Dr.
Casavantes saw that this area again could not hold any
PMMA. He suggested proactive (!) that I can come the next day again (costless!) so that they fill more in this particular area.
Beside that they really check everyday on you …. Especially Ian. ( Give Ian a tip… he deserves it! )
Please do not understand that other offices have bad services: I can only tell my experience.
L I N N E A S A F E
Also: Especially in my case - I want that the carrier-substance gets absorbed fast - That the filler settles fast and stays where it has been injected. …And there is some evidence that the bovine-carrier with
Bellafill takes longer to absorb / the filler has longer time migration-potential. So I think LinneaSafe is the better product when it comes to Penile Enhancement.
Why I tried it now again when in all that 3 Sessions the area remained empty?
Like I said it‘s not always about the office. Sometimes it‘s also about how qualified you are as a candidate. Now: With my (really amazing) tight cut „on point“ - the setting ll be significantly changed (old members here can confirm that) - especially regarding to my issue „filler migration“ - I can support that the filler stays there where it has been injected - in my empty area.
Also with a tight cut - for your doc it’s more legitim to (potentially) install more of the product cause your skin-mobility is significantly restricted.
( Explaining „squishy/empty“ : While
Erection - When you touch the area - your thumb sinks - through the skin - on your original shaft. Contrast to my other areas: They feel like very hard rubber while
Erection. While
Flaccid this contrast between the areas is already noticeable - but it gets even much more obvious while
Erection. )
