TOPIC: Anyone heard of Dr Mark Solomon or Repriza

hmm interesting how they said not at this time. Which means that theres not enough long-term data. (Which is the biggest draw back for most of us getting this procedure!) Thats why I am considering a Temp filler first, so if there is a drastic long term complication....its not something I would have to live with for the rest of my life. I still feel that even when compared to all of the other options in PE surgery(i.e. FFT,Belloderm, allograft,silicone injections,Elist implant) this has better initial results. That would normally lead one to belive that there would be better long-term results - no? I agree with your logic,and I dont want to make a horrible mistake that I will regret for the rest of my life. But PMMA is very intreging in its NON-evasive nature, and its complications not only being semi- easy to correct....but not major complications when occur in the PENIS. I mean, if a lump or \"Nodule\" were to arrise in the FACE....than this would be a major problem. But a lump in the PENIS....would that be the end of the world? Much to think about. Thank you for your feedback EQ. I hope that we can both be above our current levels in the near -term future

Since I believe that I could accomplish my (modest) 0.5' Girth goals with any of the options I don't currently see PMMA as giving the 'best' results. This following is strictly my opinion, others may differ: At this point NewPlastic is totally off the menu. From the info available it is likely somewhere in the Arteplast to early Artecol stage of refinement, not good enough for me to risk it. The Caldellas study of 21 people biopsied 180 to 450 days after injection did it for me. Elist/Implants were barely on the menu and quickly dropped off. Silicone injections? No way! FFT ' not sure the spongy 'fat' feel would work for me. Artefill is an option I would wait on.The Allografts (Alloderm/Belladerm/Repriza) looks like the best options for my particular situation. If I simplify the argument, It comes down to the risk of surgery (skill, loss of function, long term complications, or death) for Allograft vs. potential 'known unknowns' ( loss of function, tissue degeneration, embolism from migration, potential auto immune issues(granuloma) , or death ) on the Artefill side.