frankanonymous wrote: I have one last question: if the PMMA procedure has been such a success, why isn\'t there more buzz about it? For example, I\'ve noticed that that there\'s a couple of docs performing this procedure in Europe, and yet most aren\'t. I\'ve talked to guys from the UK whom have had FFT\'s and when asked about PMMA they don\'t know anything (or know very little) about it. What gives?
thanks
It\'s because Penile bioplasty with
PMMA is relatively new to Western cosmetic medicine. And it was introduced to the scene by this very forum, prior it was hardly considered an option by even the most veteran observers of penis enlargement (PE). I should also note that it takes a skilled practitioner to provide a quality result, so it\'s not like just anyone can do it.
Its \"newness\" also explains why there is little data on long-term effects/risks of its use in the penis, arguably making it an \"experimental & evolving\" craft. This forum is the only English-speaking site that I\'m aware of that is tracking the progress of penis enlargement surgery, and in particular,
PMMA.
I wouldn\'t be surprised if in a few years it\'ll be all the buzz, but by the time a large enough sample size has been gathered to determine
PMMA\'s efficacy in the long-run, I suspect advances elsewhere (i.e. stem cell) will take over for PE.