TOPIC: Foreskin Restoration

I can concur with you hulk on the sensitivity - I wear a restoration cone on and off and I often wear it just as a cap over the glans to keep it from rubbing on underwear, and even after just one week of keeping it covered (day and night) I notice quite a difference. The glans looks healthier and is also more sensitive.

IMO I think cutting off part of boy\'s penis without his consent and understanding of what is being done, is nothing short of violent physical abuse, and its the most sensitive and private part of a man\'s body. We are born with a Foreskin for a reason, it\'s the idiotic humans that think they know better. When a doctor chops off part of a woman\'s vagina...rightfully there is outrage.

I have no objection to a man who \"chooses\" to have his Foreskin removed, but doing this to infants without their understanding or consent is way wrong.

If you look back into the history of the practice of Circumcision you will find some real horror stories. The Jews used to bite the Foreskin off and many young boy\'s died from the subsequent infections from the Rabbi\'s rotting teeth. When I was going through school I used to think Hydrogen was the most abundant element in the universe. Later I discovered it was stupidity.

ilovetofu wrote: I can concur with you hulk on the sensitivity - I wear a restoration cone on and off and I often wear it just as a cap over the glans to keep it from rubbing on underwear, and even after just one week of keeping it covered (day and night) I notice quite a difference. The glans looks healthier and is also more sensitive.

IMO I think cutting off part of boy\'s penis without his consent and understanding of what is being done, is nothing short of violent physical abuse, and its the most sensitive and private part of a man\'s body. We are born with a Foreskin for a reason, it\'s the idiotic humans that think they know better. When a doctor chops off part of a woman\'s vagina...rightfully there is outrage.

I have no objection to a man who \"chooses\" to have his Foreskin removed, but doing this to infants without their understanding or consent is way wrong.

If you look back into the history of the practice of Circumcision you will find some real horror stories. The Jews used to bite the Foreskin off and many young boy\'s died from the subsequent infections from the Rabbi\'s rotting teeth. When I was going through school I used to think Hydrogen was the most abundant element in the universe. Later I discovered it was stupidity. .

I just think some guys have too much time on their hands. Im all for manual PE and surgery if needed, but this is on my being ridiculous list. If it got snipped off theres nothing you could/ should do. To me personally its just not aesthetic. But if you have it already, I dont think you should chop it off. And if you dont have it, I dont think you should spend your precious time trying to get it back. its silly. No ones biting off Foreskin these days so I think the babies will be fine. We evolve things dont have to stay the way they used to be 100\'s of years ago. Thats the beauty of the human race.

New1inch wrote: No ones biting off Foreskin these days so I think the babies will be fine.

This is the funniest thing I have read.

I just think some guys have too much time on their hands. Im all for manual PE and surgery if needed, but this is on my being ridiculous list. If it got snipped off theres nothing you could/ should do. To me personally its just not aesthetic. But if you have it already, I dont think you should chop it off. And if you dont have it, I dont think you should spend your precious time trying to get it back. its silly. No ones biting off Foreskin these days so I think the babies will be fine. We evolve things dont have to stay the way they used to be 100\'s of years ago. Thats the beauty of the human race. - NEW1INCH

No the kind of comment I would have expected from you. I think people should do what they want to do with their bodies. You say \"I dont think you should spend your precious time trying to get it back. its silly.\" The only thing silly is that comment. Many men go to great lengths to restore their Foreskin because they want to and they can. Who are you to judge them and say its silly. Is it any more silly than a man who \"wastes his precious time\" enhancing his penis? What would you think of a person who says you are silly in doing the things you do?\"No ones biting off Foreskin these days so I think the babies will be fine.\" This comment/joke makes light of tragedy, suffering and even the death of people, not something I find funny. Especially when these babies lost their life needlessly through stupidity.As for your comment about evolution, it is evolution that gave mankind a Foreskin in the first place. I guess that\'s the beauty of evolution.But don't feel sad if you are Circumcised. Take comfort in knowing you share something with many others and that scar on your body is there in the most part because of people wanting to control you and take away your pleasures.Technically, you're Circumcised because the Nineteenth Century prude who invented Corn Flakes was trying to ruin your sex life. If you don\'t understand that comment then you would need to read up on the history and practice of Circumcision.Circumcision outside the Jewish and Muslim faiths is nothing more than old-school, prudish and Puritanical sex-shaming. The first doctors to perform genital mutilation surgeries (Circumcision) on babies, did so because they believed it would squash the urge to masturbate.It was the Greeks who understood. They disliked Circumcision because they regarded a man as truly \"naked\" only if his prepuce was retracted.---Karen Erickson Paige wrote: \"The current medical rationale for Circumcision developed after the operation was in wide practice. The original reason for the surgical Removal of the Foreskin, or prepuce, was to control \'masturbatory insanity\' ' the range of mental disorders that people believed were caused by the \'polluting\' practice of \'self-abuse.\'\" \"Self-abuse\" was a term commonly used to describe masturbation in the 19th century.In the 1890s, it became a popular technique to prevent, or cure, masturbatory insanity. In 1891 the president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England published On Circumcision as Preventive of Masturbation, and two years later another British doctor wrote Circumcision: Its Advantages and How to Perform It, which listed the reasons for removing the \"vestigial\" prepuce. Evidently the Foreskin could cause \"nocturnal incontinence,\" hysteria, epilepsy, and irritation that might \"give rise to erotic stimulation and, consequently, masturbation.\" Another physician, P.C. Remondino, added that \"Circumcision is like a substantial and well-secured life annuity ... it insures better health, greater capacity for labor, longer life, less nervousness, sickness, loss of time, and less doctor bills.\" No wonder it became a popular remedy.At the same time circumcisions were advocated on men, clitoridectomies (Removal of the clitoris) were also performed for the same reason (to treat female masturbators). The US \"Orificial Surgery Society\" for female \"Circumcision\" operated until 1925, and clitoridectomies and infibulations would continue to be advocated by some through the 1930s. As late as 1936, L. E. Holt, an author of paediatric textbooks, advocated male and female Circumcision as a treatment for masturbation.One of the leading advocates of Circumcision was John Harvey Kellogg. He advocated the consumption of Kellogg\'s corn flakes to prevent masturbation, and he believed that Circumcision would be an effective way to eliminate masturbation in males.In the 19th century the role of the Foreskin in erotic sensation was well understood by physicians who wanted to cut it off precisely because they considered it the major factor leading boys to masturbation. The Victorian physician and venereologist William Acton (1814'1875) damned it as \"a source of serious mischief\", and most of his contemporaries concurred. Both opponents and supporters of Circumcision agreed that the significant role the Foreskin played in sexual response was the main reason why it should be either left in place or removed. William Hammond, a Professor of Mind in New York in the late 19th century, commented that \"Circumcision, when performed in early life, generally lessens the voluptuous sensations of sexual intercourse\", and both he and Acton considered the Foreskin necessary for optimal sexual function, especially in old age. Jonathan Hutchinson, English surgeon and pathologist (1828'1913), and many others, thought this was the main reason why it should be excised.Mainstream paediatric manuals continued to recommend Circumcision as a deterrent against masturbation until the 1950s.

I know with or without people still masturbate, so no point in Circumcision from stopping it. The overall appearance of a Circumcised penis just appeals to me. I guess I have porn to blame for that.

Is a penis something appealing? I always wondered when I posted my pics in my progress report. I actually found it not very appealing, the same with vaginas though. Not the most beautiful body parts, are they?

undecided wrote: Is a penis something appealing? I always wondered when I posted my pics in my progress report. I actually found it not very appealing, the same with vaginas though. Not the most beautiful body parts, are they?

Lol well I guess everyone has different likings to the human body, but yes brother your penis is looking good. Once it\'s healed fully you may think different.

ilovetofu wrote:

I just think some guys have too much time on their hands. Im all for manual PE and surgery if needed, but this is on my being ridiculous list. If it got snipped off theres nothing you could/ should do. To me personally its just not aesthetic. But if you have it already, I dont think you should chop it off. And if you dont have it, I dont think you should spend your precious time trying to get it back. its silly. No ones biting off Foreskin these days so I think the babies will be fine. We evolve things dont have to stay the way they used to be 100\'s of years ago. Thats the beauty of the human race. - NEW1INCH

No the kind of comment I would have expected from you. I think people should do what they want to do with their bodies. You say \"I dont think you should spend your precious time trying to get it back. its silly.\" The only thing silly is that comment. Many men go to great lengths to restore their Foreskin because they want to and they can. Who are you to judge them and say its silly. Is it any more silly than a man who \"wastes his precious time\" enhancing his penis? What would you think of a person who says you are silly in doing the things you do?\"No ones biting off Foreskin these days so I think the babies will be fine.\" This comment/joke makes light of tragedy, suffering and even the death of people, not something I find funny. Especially when these babies lost their life needlessly through stupidity.As for your comment about evolution, it is evolution that gave mankind a Foreskin in the first place. I guess that\'s the beauty of evolution.But don't feel sad if you are Circumcised. Take comfort in knowing you share something with many others and that scar on your body is there in the most part because of people wanting to control you and take away your pleasures.Technically, you're Circumcised because the Nineteenth Century prude who invented Corn Flakes was trying to ruin your sex life. If you don\'t understand that comment then you would need to read up on the history and practice of Circumcision.Circumcision outside the Jewish and Muslim faiths is nothing more than old-school, prudish and Puritanical sex-shaming. The first doctors to perform genital mutilation surgeries (Circumcision) on babies, did so because they believed it would squash the urge to masturbate.It was the Greeks who understood. They disliked Circumcision because they regarded a man as truly \"naked\" only if his prepuce was retracted.---Karen Erickson Paige wrote: \"The current medical rationale for Circumcision developed after the operation was in wide practice. The original reason for the surgical Removal of the Foreskin, or prepuce, was to control \'masturbatory insanity\' ' the range of mental disorders that people believed were caused by the \'polluting\' practice of \'self-abuse.\'\" \"Self-abuse\" was a term commonly used to describe masturbation in the 19th century.In the 1890s, it became a popular technique to prevent, or cure, masturbatory insanity. In 1891 the president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England published On Circumcision as Preventive of Masturbation, and two years later another British doctor wrote Circumcision: Its Advantages and How to Perform It, which listed the reasons for removing the \"vestigial\" prepuce. Evidently the Foreskin could cause \"nocturnal incontinence,\" hysteria, epilepsy, and irritation that might \"give rise to erotic stimulation and, consequently, masturbation.\" Another physician, P.C. Remondino, added that \"Circumcision is like a substantial and well-secured life annuity ... it insures better health, greater capacity for labor, longer life, less nervousness, sickness, loss of time, and less doctor bills.\" No wonder it became a popular remedy.At the same time circumcisions were advocated on men, clitoridectomies (Removal of the clitoris) were also performed for the same reason (to treat female masturbators). The US \"Orificial Surgery Society\" for female \"Circumcision\" operated until 1925, and clitoridectomies and infibulations would continue to be advocated by some through the 1930s. As late as 1936, L. E. Holt, an author of paediatric textbooks, advocated male and female Circumcision as a treatment for masturbation.One of the leading advocates of Circumcision was John Harvey Kellogg. He advocated the consumption of Kellogg\'s corn flakes to prevent masturbation, and he believed that Circumcision would be an effective way to eliminate masturbation in males.In the 19th century the role of the Foreskin in erotic sensation was well understood by physicians who wanted to cut it off precisely because they considered it the major factor leading boys to masturbation. The Victorian physician and venereologist William Acton (1814'1875) damned it as \"a source of serious mischief\", and most of his contemporaries concurred. Both opponents and supporters of Circumcision agreed that the significant role the Foreskin played in sexual response was the main reason why it should be either left in place or removed. William Hammond, a Professor of Mind in New York in the late 19th century, commented that \"Circumcision, when performed in early life, generally lessens the voluptuous sensations of sexual intercourse\", and both he and Acton considered the Foreskin necessary for optimal sexual function, especially in old age. Jonathan Hutchinson, English surgeon and pathologist (1828'1913), and many others, thought this was the main reason why it should be excised.Mainstream paediatric manuals continued to recommend Circumcision as a deterrent against masturbation until the 1950s.

Im not gonna read all that. But, I was simply explaining that your saying these things like its still going on in the 21st century. All Im saying is I dont see the point of wasting time trying to get Foreskin back. I normally don\'t judge, but I think its stupid. Its not my Dick though so anyone can do as they please with their unit and their time.

Im not gonna read all that. But, I was simply explaining that your saying these things like its still going on in the 21st century. All Im saying is I dont see the point of wasting time trying to get Foreskin back. I normally don\'t judge, but I think its stupid. Its not my Dick though so anyone can do as they please with their unit and their time. -NEW1INCH

No, my post doesn\'t say anything about bitting foreskins off today, I pointed out that this is what used to happen and the reason why it was so stupid. Hence my post said \"If you look back into the history...\".

I\'m glad that you\'re happy that \"anyone can do as they please with their unit and their time.\"

However, I would like to know why you think the practice of a person restoring their Foreskin is \"stupid.\" I\'m doing this myself and I\'m quite pleased with the changes. My glans is looking more healthy and has more feeling. Can you please explain why you think that\'s stupid?

ilovetofu wrote:

Im not gonna read all that. But, I was simply explaining that your saying these things like its still going on in the 21st century. All Im saying is I dont see the point of wasting time trying to get Foreskin back. I normally don\'t judge, but I think its stupid. Its not my Dick though so anyone can do as they please with their unit and their time. -NEW1INCH

No, my post doesn\'t say anything about bitting foreskins off today, I pointed out that this is what used to happen and the reason why it was so stupid. Hence my post said \"If you look back into the history...\".

I\'m glad that you\'re happy that \"anyone can do as they please with their unit and their time.\"

However, I would like to know why you think the practice of a person restoring their Foreskin is \"stupid.\" I\'m doing this myself and I\'m quite pleased with the changes. My glans is looking more healthy and has more feeling. Can you please explain why you think that\'s stupid?

Because you can die tomorrow, Or today for that matter. Why would anyone want to spend the \"precious time\" that we do have on this earth to try and get a flap of skin to stretch around their glans? And to me and from conversations with people it just dont look as nice as a cut penis. How much will sex be with a Foreskin vs without? No one knows because someone who\'s never had Foreskin dont know what it would feel like to have it, and someone with Foreskin doesn\'t know what it would feel like without it. . I just was stating my opinion that its stupid and a waste. Theres nothing that will change my mind on subject. Didn\'t think I was offending anyone doing that. I dont wanna talk about this anymore because I couldn\'t care less. I don\'t come here to talk Foreskin. Im a PE guy. Good luck.

New1inch wrote:

ilovetofu wrote:

Im not gonna read all that. But, I was simply explaining that your saying these things like its still going on in the 21st century. All Im saying is I dont see the point of wasting time trying to get Foreskin back. I normally don\'t judge, but I think its stupid. Its not my Dick though so anyone can do as they please with their unit and their time. -NEW1INCH

No, my post doesn\'t say anything about bitting foreskins off today, I pointed out that this is what used to happen and the reason why it was so stupid. Hence my post said \"If you look back into the history...\".

I\'m glad that you\'re happy that \"anyone can do as they please with their unit and their time.\"

However, I would like to know why you think the practice of a person restoring their Foreskin is \"stupid.\" I\'m doing this myself and I\'m quite pleased with the changes. My glans is looking more healthy and has more feeling. Can you please explain why you think that\'s stupid?

Because you can die tomorrow, Or today for that matter. Why would anyone want to spend the \"precious time\" that we do have on this earth to try and get a flap of skin to stretch around their glans? And to me and from conversations with people it just dont look as nice as a cut penis. How much will sex be with a Foreskin vs without? No one knows because someone who\'s never had Foreskin dont know what it would feel like to have it, and someone with Foreskin doesn\'t know what it would feel like without it. . I just was stating my opinion that its stupid and a waste. Theres nothing that will change my mind on subject. Didn\'t think I was offending anyone doing that. I dont wanna talk about this anymore because I couldn\'t care less. I don\'t come here to talk Foreskin. Im a PE guy. Good luck.

As the saying goes let\'s agree to disagree.

Just trying to understand your reasoning 1inch, that\'s all. Despite what you say, there are many men who\'ve had a Foreskin and then had it removed, so many people do in fact know what its like with and without. The same is somewhat true of the other way around for those who\'ve succeeded in Foreskin restoration - the topic of this thread.

I wrote a rather long post because I find the whole history of Circumcision strange and interesting. Sorry if you\'re not interested to read it.

Anyways, my intention was not to upset you in any way, or offend anyone.

I read it and I found it interesting. Moreover I thought of Circumcision to improve the look after PMMA but I won\'t give up my Foreskin now

I think that\'s a wise decision. Unless there is a serious medical issue, Circumcision without understanding and consent is a awful violation of a person\'s body. How are things going for you undecided? Would you wind back the clock if you could or are you happy with your PMMA result?

wOW can\'t believe what I am reading, when I said, I was going to restore, I was attacked by so many members on here. I have restored for like 3 months, I have extra skin and feels much better.