It\'s irrelevant whether it\'s temporary or not. There is a reason experienced Dr\'s inject
HA in the shaft via a cannula. When you consider they still take that precaution when they are able to make skin \"tent\", it should say something about injecting into the glans.
[
- Yes but its not injected into the shaft , or at least mine was not. Its above and cannula no, then you need stich. They stick needle in, down push down and then once in pull it back and squirt so not blocking anything up, you get what im trying to explain.
]
Blocking the vascular supply is just as likely with
HA as with any filler.
[
Its like 2 million a year in US get this and what 5 cases from bad injecting by nurses ]
With a sharp needle you can injure the vessel, compress or block it with filler. It\'s harder to tell if you\'ve done damage in the glans than in the face.
[First part is right can injure, 2nd part unlikely (pull backwards as push in filler] The pain would be unbearable so youd know it, but they inject a dissolver]
I\'m not or never have been planning glans enlargement, but the only reason I comment on discussions about it is to make people aware that it\'s risky and not worth it for the small gains we\'ve observed.
We\'ve only had about 5 or 6 guys report glans enhancement and as you know 2 have turned necrotic.
It wasn\'t to do with permanency of the filler, but I do believe they were HA based fillers on both occasions. [please provide the link, I had it and no issue just looked weird, like a sea shell]
I\'m not saying it\'s a big risk, but just that it\'s not a risk worth taking. The guys who did have Necrosis didn\'t seem to gain much anyway. 
