wannabhung45 wrote:
Who did ur FFT procedure? And how long ago? It appears that there may be better advancements now in terms of keeping the fat alive via prp as well as purifying it and ridding it of impurities. This in turn may help the fat from either dissipating and or disappearing completely over extended periods of time.
Whether it survives or not isn't main problem.
I think fat is an unstable substance to have in the subcutaneous layer.
Unlike stimulatory fillers that produce collagen which almost grow into and cling onto your internal tissues, fat, when injected has nothing to hold it in place and more often than not will produce lumps.
HA isn't a stimulatory filler but the lumps I've seen from that aren't nearly as bad as the lumps ive seen from Fat, perhaps it's because
HA is a gel which makes it more pliable and it doesn't rely on blood flow.
HA is more dynamic and seems to mould into whatever position/state your penis is in, and can be reversed with 24 hours.
The lumps from fat seem to much more severe, once the fat is moved or blood flow is obstructed which is almost inevitable the fat cells tend to bind together and go rock hard.
People who have fat complain about the unnatural feel, and often spend years trying to get rid of a lump only for another one to appear soon after.
I had MegaFill nearly 3 years ago, which is similar to
FFT, when I talk to people who've had fat they have have the same problems I have.
If you do decide to have
FFT, morgernstern is the best option because he has the best track record for dealing with lumps.
Whatever you choose, good luck?
