Dream wrote:
Oh my!
So
1. the swelling only disappeared after a few months
2. only then you saw the (long hardened) end result
Do you think there would be a way to monitor the even-ness of the distribution, now looking back?
(And \'correcting\' with massage in first 3 days?)
A new form of free fat transfer?
I\'ve read a little, not enough, that the stem cell serum free fat method isuch better at preventing absorption and staying even, still causes problems in some cases I\'ve seen though.
Anyways, swelling probably wasn\'t the right word, I just said that because people on here have theorized that there is long term swelling for months which explains why gains decrease after 3-6 months even after initial healing. Could be that, or new collagen fibers losing mass, or something else.
The immediate swelling from the procedure was always gone after a week or two. The beluga lump was definitely noticeable by that point, but I assumed it would go away over time.
By the three month mark, actually seemed like a really fast process when it happened - like one day just changed. Some of the
PMMA became a lot softer and more natural feeling, but
Girth decreased by a few fractions of an
Inch even though it held steady until then. At this point lumps + the main lump on top were much more noticeable and stayed harder than the other material. I could put my fingers underneath it and basically lift up the lump from the rest of my penis and almost feel my fingers touch through to skin between it and above my natural penis.
By 6 month mark another decrease in
Girth and more softness of the other parts. Had everywhere felt like the parts that softened, the treatment would be a miracle as everything just felt like natural skin. I guess the good result guys have this, I don\'t know.
Anyways this pattern seems common enough were after 6 months there are
Girth losses as things soften up and kind of jelly-fy. I would say this is when remaining hard lumps become the worst in terms of being distinct and obvious.