TOPIC: PMAA on circumsized penis

chester wrote: While it\'s technically possible, especially when you consider variables, such as collagen formation, diet, age and genetics, I believe \"happiness\" at this percentage and volume more prudently starts at around a .4 increase.

I was told by Ian in an email that due to my circumzicion, I would get a \"low volume and low concentration of PMMA.\" I\'m assuming it\'ll be 10% and he also said I would probably get 1/4\"-1/2\" Girth improvement. 1/4!? Man, I don\'t know if that\'s worth my $3,000....What do you guys think?

camphallo wrote: Not to put a dampener on your plans, but .75\" with 10% is not possible with the normal volume administered in one session.

Based on your experience, how much gain can I expect with a \"low volume and low concentration of PMMA.\"? I was told by Dr C\'s office I can expect .25\"-.50\" gain. Is that too conservative of a expectation?

$3k for 1/4 to 1/2? I wouldn\'t.

Would you pay $9000 for 1.5\"? Just sayin....

Keep that Foreskin, a penis as nature planned.

Keep that Foreskin, a penis as nature planned.

Like PMMA on an uncircumcised penis is \"as nature planned\"?

camphallo wrote:
Like PMMA on an uncircumcised penis is \"as nature planned\"?

Well having a Foreskin and having PMMA is more natural than not having a Foreskin and having PMMA, I see your point but your misinterpreting what he said.

Rek,

\"Natural looking\" and \"Natural\" are two different things.

I can speak on this first hand as I have experienced both ways.

I can\'t be arsed arguing with you mate.

That we are in full agreement bud.