TOPIC: The biggest Dick, registered in Brazil. (Photos from the book "The Measure of Man")

It means;
It means you can not claim to have read something without having to prove
They are just letters written in the wind.
If every post made, you get to write it elsewhere, others saw these photos (which I highly doubt), without disclosing the source difissil is to believe what you hoddle writes.

I myself was curious and anxious to see his claim be proven here.
The M7 is awaiting its own response.
As I said,
\'m LPSG member and would like to see where you saw there that made this publication here.
Solely and exclusively, for the phalloboard.
Its kind of writing may lead to other members who are also reading, take the wrong conclusions about it and raising a myth that does not exist.

The myth that you saw this photo somewhere else (LPSG), with people evaluating the photo and that the photo was fake.
That fact that you wrote, seems to have, simply invented by you.
Why?
I am a big skeptic
And I await your response, I hope you\'ve rushed or confused with another similar post.
sincerely,
Carlos.

In short are you asking me to prove I\'ve seen the photo elsewhere?

If you are I will go the effort and find it, which will be difficult as I don\'t know what search term to use. I will however not use this as an excuse and absolutely guarantee that I will find it by the end of the day.

When I do so, please do not apologize for your skepticism, as it\'s not a big deal at all and totally unimportant.

I can\'t help but think a language barrier issue is the issue here, as you seem to be getting carried away about the most trivial thing. Even if I can\'t find proof of it being discussed elsewhere (I will though, zero doubt, as I have seen it and not long ago either), it still doesn\'t change anything as it\'s just a black and white photo taken in some guys bedroom. It\'s authenticity is massively open to debate.

This isn\'t the thread I was talking about, but you may recognize the guy in the photos.

www.lpsg.com/87004-15-inches-4.html

I almost wrote that in his next post, there would be a comment on the language barrier.
Do not apologized for anything.
You said that the M7 had seen that picture a long time ago.

Hope you do not create a post elsewhere with a copy of this photo just to give his speech to the basement.
Not even as a moderator, shows you committed to writing.
I did not expect this from you.
Making mistakes is human, to persist in error is foolish.
You can come back here and humbly reassess what you wrote.
You not only issued its opinion,

You tried to influence the minds of other members who have posted here, claiming to have seen this picture in LPSG.

carlos_labrada wrote: I almost wrote that in his next post, there would be a comment on the language barrier.
Do not apologized for anything.
You said that the M7 had seen that picture a long time ago.

Hope you do not create a post elsewhere with a copy of this photo just to give his speech to the basement.
Not even as a moderator, shows you committed to writing.
I did not expect this from you.
Making mistakes is human, to persist in error is foolish.
You can come back here and humbly reassess what you wrote.
You not only issued its opinion,

You tried to influence the minds of other members who have posted here, claiming to have seen this picture in LPSG.

Carlos I\'m not being rude, but there is a language barrier problem here. I simply can\'t understand you. I\'m not trying to annoy you or belittle you, as I can\'t speak Portuguese at all, so it would be hugely hypocritical to do so. I\'m sure other members will chime and confirm that it\'s hard to make sense of what you are writing. For example, the part I\'ve highlighted just makes no sense at all.

You are over reacting to a total non issue. You must of mistranslated or over emphasized something I said. But I assure and I\'m sure the other English speakers who read will confirm, that you are making a big deal out of nothing. I never called you a liar, if that is what you think.

If you look in the link I posted above you\'ll see plenty of photos of the same guy, on the same bed and with the same books in the corner. I\'ts not the exact thread I was talking about, but should be more than enough proof that the photo has been posted and discussed elsewhere before. You can even see a Flaccid shot that doesn\'t even look at all real.

@Carlos & Hoddle

Sometimes comments can be misunderstood due to a language barrier. Carlos, you speak and write well but there are times where the text can be confusing. This is natural because English is not your first language.

Hoddle, I would recommend more basic sentence structures so that online translators do a better job converting the text (assuming he\'s using them).

No one is calling each other a liar, and this should be a friendly discussion. I ask we return to normal conversation. Thanks

@hoddle
Now your post is getting better,
It was what I expected,

You really rushed when writing such statements to other members of the group,
Where you stated your own opinion.
I had seen this post on LPSG, and even there the members reached a conclusion as to you can \"claim\" that members of LPSG came to a conclusion that the pictures were fakes.
Who is monitoring the thread LPSG will see who has the most diverse opinions, even opinions very creative, inventive and absurd.
LPSG is a forum that you can not have the penis larger than that of another member unless he contests it. (It\'s strange but true)

The photos were published in LPSG book written by Gary Griffin, in the 90s. you get these photos in the collection of the Society of Andrology Gaucha. (photos acquired in the decade 60-70)
The family of the boy sought medical help for evaluation of your case.
I do not understand graphical computing but I think there was no photoshop this time.

I recommend reading the post of the veterans who also know the story of this boy.
You can find whatever you want, say what they want, issuing its opinion.
And not the other.
His only mistake in my view this was.

@ S.O.
When I see a moderator, warning that another moderator:
Elsewhere, other people have said, that this image is false.
ETC ....
The minimum for education and feedback, is to disclose the source.
I value the phalloboard be a place where information is taken seriously.
Phalloboard is a small forum, consisting of real members, doing real things, it has everything to grow with level.
Sorry if I seemed offensive.

They might have been published in an Andrology journal, but they weren\'t taken for that purpose. They were part of a collection of big penis photo book, that had no medical purpose. They are essentially porn shots, that for some reason a medical journal has published. From what I\'ve read in that thread it seems they are more likely from the 1980\'s. But even in the 1970\'s they were using very convincing fake penis\'s for pornography. A famous British porn star got away with using a fake penis for years. His name was Long Dong Silver and it was claimed he was 15\", but years later it was revealed to be a fake. The key is, like the guy in the photo you posted, there is no skin connection between the scrotum and bottom of the shaft.

Carlos please don\'t write things like, \"That\'s what you inventing this.\"

It may well be a translation issue, but if so please be sure of what you are writing as you may not realize it, but your tone comes across as very, very irritating.

Posting a photo with the guy sat there with his legs wide apart and his asshole showing doesn\'t help your course. That\'s classed as pornography. I\'m not inventing anything. What kind of Andrology Journal would get a young boy to pose for shots like that? I know Brazil is more liberal but give me a break!

There is no sign of scrotal webbing in any of those photos. Also the pubic hair appears to have been groomed and is very thick, which would be consistent with use of a prosthetic.

It\'s really not a big deal if this is real or not. It\'s totally unimportant. Right from the start I tried to placate you and made it very clear I wasn\'t calling you a liar. I don\'t understand why you thought I might have done in the first place. To be honest I don\'t understand how you\'ve managed to make such a big deal out of any of this.

SO rightly called for friendly discussion, but it\'s hard not to react to the way you choose to post. At the end of the day this is a thread in the \"lust, life and vanity\" section of a forum. Yet you are treating as if we are in court debating a Libel case, telling people how they should and shouldn\'t post. This is such a trivial thing. It\'s not in the least bit important. It\'s a photo of a guy with a big Cock, that may or may not be real.

Forget the photos. The most important thing to take from this discussion is to be sure you know exactly what you are saying and how it will come across when you post. I know it must be very difficult and as i said previously, I wouldn\'t dream of criticizing your English, as I can\'t speak any foreign language. I don\'t know whether it was intentional, but at times your posts had a very irritating tone and they seemed accusing, even though the topic itself and my posts didn\'t call for or warrant such a response.

Incredibly surreal thread! The funniest thing.

I am laughing like crazy thinking about good old rational Hoddle cursing in front of his pc after having been hijacked to an Alice in Wonderland tea party kind of situation, hahahahahaha.

I\'ve seen these photos over at LPSG before too.

@hodlle and all members
****Read it with attention, if you need to reread to be sure of what he writes, please reread.****

*************Most important part:***************

In my last post I tried to go back to the initial proposal of this session.

\"That was never just evaluate photos, but to discuss material found in books, medical centers dedicated to the subject, magazines, to assess whether these books are posting real pictures of real people, or just messing with the collective imagination.\"

IMHO.


SECOND PART
\"If this was the opinion of hoddle, these sources could be manipulating photos, he could have done it, writing to me.\"

Simple,

hoddle, could have alerted M7, that the photos were fakes, and alert me too.
I made the first post because of this.
how it makes the alert appears that tried to manipulate the mind of another friend in the forum, I value my good value here in the forum, and I have gained respect and friends, for it.

for ALL MEMBERS /IMPORTANT:

Contest initially Hoodle how he focused on his post, never contested the veracity of photographs never discriminated, free thinking of individuals.
Only contest, how biased as Hoodle wrote. (Wrote - past verb)

1º - He said they were pornographic pictures, and that\'s not true.
2º - He said they were photos, manipulated, and that I look forward arguments still valid.

He tried to mix other stories, LONGDONGSILVER, Brazil liberal country?, And so on .......
You yourselves can see that he was biased when writing.
And biased.
Where\'s the rationality in that?
Where are the good practices forum?
I have not spoken to another country so biased, not pulled pornography pictures, not of any opinion disagreed.

@BIG MEAT,
I\'m still with good humor always laughing at all this.
If hodlle gets angry with what you\'re reading, that\'s his problem and not mine.
I do not think LPSG is a type certificate for anything, and there was also divided opinion, who found the photo are fake; used arguments very poor. (IMHO).

@supa,
welcome aboard
ME TOO, In the end we will soon all laugh about it, realy funny.

3º PART -
I hope hoddle,
Seek humor, not contesting aggressively, make friends and not enemies in the forum.
Respect diversity and other countries (ALL THE WORD).
Hoodle you\'re a moderator, you need to have these qualities.

Another member may have another source with another material, something to add to the discussion and may be failing to do so.
Due to the large prejudiced found here.

Have I reached my goals, I am publishing material saved a lot of time to appreciate.

Phalloboard forum that needs help, participation and donations.
Hoddle,

I\'m a skeptic like you, a new opinion in my view has since source has only to enrich the discussion.


hoddle,
Do not fret, they are just pictures of a guy with a huge sausage (fake or not)

I invite to read my profile, I have email if you want more information about Brazil feel free to contact, the same holds for other forum members, I\'m totally open to the most diverse opinions.


To err is human, to persist in error is nonsense.

All and hoddle,
I was just sharing something (curiosity scanned from a book), with my friends in phalloboard forum


Sincerely,

Carlos

Carlos
I consider you a valuable member of this board and appreciate your contribution to the board.
That being said, I sincerely believe Hoddle was not trying to be antagonistic in his posts to you. Please reread his posts.
I am not sure if it is in the translation or what...
There is a difference between countering someone and intentionally being rude and insulting. I don\'t believe Hoddle was trying to do this...